As most Americans know, Congress
recently found a temporary agreement to the imminent "fiscal cliff"
debacle. In its attempt to salvage the American economy, Congress made a compromise in the form of a
short-term solution, but what does that even mean for us Americans and the
future of our economy?
Over break, my father showed me an
op-ed by P.J. O'Rourke in The Wall Street
Journal. O’Rourke, my father told me, used to be a writer for Rolling Stone magazine. Entitled
"Dear Mr. President, Zero-Sum Doesn't Add Up," the opinion piece
argues that redistribution of American's wealth from the richer to the poorer
does not build a stronger economy. Rather than claiming that "there is
only so much money," O’Rourke does not believe that America’s wealth is
finite. He raises a legitimate question: why not have "more pizza parlors
baking more pizzas"? That way, everyone has a stake in more pizza, or more
money.
Relating this back to the fiscal cliff,
I think that although the agreement is a compromise, it is not good enough. Because of their unwillingness to cooperate,
government officials on both the right and the left have contributed to
America’s economic problems. Although conservatives are certainly not perfect,
as their unwillingness to compromise on such areas as defense spending attests,
Mr. O'Rourke raises an interesting point in his column: "The evil of
zero-sum thinking and redistributive politics has nothing to do with which
things are taken or to whom those things are given or what the sum of zero
things is supposed to be. The evil lies in denying people the right, the
means, and, indeed, the duty to make more things" [emphasis added].
Now, in my American Studies class, we
were recently talking about rights and how suppressing those rights can run
counter to what a country stands for. While few people will object to these tax
hikes for the wealthy, I agree with Mr. O'Rourke that we must be careful to
avoid “denying people the right. . . . to make more things."
So I ask you, the reader, what is your take on the recent
fiscal cliff drama?
Do
you agree with P.J. O'Rourke that President Obama's economic stance is
redistributionist? Is the right to make things a right that America should protect?
Hi Clark,
ReplyDeleteA provocative post, for sure. Anchoring your text in Mr. O'Rourke's column was a smart move. However, a few suggestions:
1) Ask yourself, how well are you analyzing/explaining quotes? For example, "why not have 'more pizza parlors baking more pizzas'?" still is not clear to me what this means, even after your explanation. Furthermore, the last quote is 5+ lines and contains no explanation.
2) Empathy for the reader: are you assuming that your readers will know exactly how the "fiscal cliff" crisis was resolved with a tax hike? It wasn't made clear in your text.
3) Critically examine your source: O'Rourke is politically conservative, as is the WSJ. It's important to note his angle, at the very least.